Structural System Design - New Location: Charleston, South Carolina

For educational purposes a new building site in Charleston, South Carolina was chosen for a visually identical building with a different structural system. The site was chosen because it poses more risk for significant seismic activity and severe winds from hurricanes. A new floor system was designed using full composite action (slab and beam) for the reason of reducing the weight of the floor system. A new main lateral force resisting system was designed using special reinforced concrete shear walls located around the core of the building. Even though this system adds considerable weight, it was chosen because it has a higher response modification factor for determining seismic loads (R = 6, verses 5 for composite steel and concrete concentrically braced steel frames). To further reduce design seismic forces and base shear, a dynamic analysis was performed (Modal Superposition).

Two other areas of Architectural Engineering were also studied. The new structural system had little effect on construction costs and scheduling (breadth topic 1). The new location poses higher cooling demands so various other systems were looked at to reduce energy demands and consumption. A reflective roof surface and solar array would help reduce energy costs for the new building (breadth topic 2).

* Update 4-21-10 Addendum 1:
Drifts due to wind in the report were calculated using 1.0*Wind and compared to L/400.  Referring to ASCE CC.1.2, using the full service load is conservative and suggests a more reasonable value of 0.7*Wind.  When using 0.7*Wind, maximum story drift was calculated to be L/604, which is the upper end of the desired range for drift limitations.

Executive Summary - POSTED 4-07-10
Full Report - POSTED 4-07-10
Appendices A though E - POSTED 4-07-10
Appendices F though J - POSTED 4-07-10

Addendum 1 - POSTED 4-21-10