References

 

Balboni, B., ed. (2011). RS Means Square Foot Costs 2011, 32nd ed., RS Means Company, Kingston, MA.

Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2008. Print.


Leet, Kenneth, and Chia-Ming Uang. Fundamentals of Structural Analysis. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2002. Print.
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE7-05) and Commentary. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005. Print.


Nilson, Srthur H., Darwin, David., Dolan, Charles W., Design of Concrete Structures. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2010. Print.
Steel Construction Manual. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction, 2007. Print.


Stein, Benjamin. Mechanical and Electrical Equipment for Buildings. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2006. Print.


Wight, James K., F. E. Richart, James G. MacGregor, and James G. MacGregor. Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PEARSON PRENTICE HALL, 2012. Print.


United States Green Building Council (2005).”LEED for New Construction and Major Renovation, Version 2.2.” <http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=220> (Mar. 14, 2011).

Waier, P. R., ed. (2011). RS Means Building Construction Cost Data 2011, 69th ed., RS Means Company, Kingston, MA.
Weston Solutions. “GreenGrid System.” <http://www.greengridroofs.com/system/index.htm> (Mar. 15, 2011).

 

Note: While great efforts have been taken to provide accurate and complete information on the pages of CPEP, please be aware that the information contained herewith is considered a work-in-progress for this thesis pNote: While great efforts have been taken to provide accurate and complete information on the pages of CPEP, please be aware that the information contained herewith is considered a work-in-progress for this thesis project. Modifications and changes related to the the original building designs and construction methodologies for this sneior thesis project are solely the interpretation of Christopher Dunlay. Changes and discrepancies in no way imply that the oriinal design contained errors or was flawed. Differing assumptions, code references, requirements, and methodologies have been incorporated into this thesis project; therefore, investigation results may vary from the orginial design.roject. Modifications and changes related to the the original building designs and construction methodologies for this sneior thesis project are solely the interpretation of Christopher Dunlay. Changes and discrepancies in no way imply that the original design contained errors or was flawed. Differing assumptions, code feferences, requirements, and methodologies have been incorporated into this thesis project; therefore, investigation results may vary from the original design