|
MAKING HISTORY; Planning for the Future
The Philosophy of Interdisciplinary Lesson Planning
Robert P. Rich
Chemistry and General Science Instructor
Frederick County Public Schools
It is of growing concern to educators to provide students with classroom
experiences that are at once both relative to their understanding and relevant
to their daily lives. Educators are being routinely tasked to provide hands-on
experiences that demonstrate the use and function of life-skills and processes
that are accurate models of real world situations and scenarios, as well
as, immediately applicable beyond the classroom. Students of any age do
not experience life as a series of discrete phenomena, however, public schools
have historically sought to instruct by explaining the world in terms of
these discrete phenomena with little regard for the synthesis of knowledge
across disciplines. In truth, students experience new situations in their
life as a whole and must be able to interpret these situations as a whole.
It is this manner of thought that has led to the interdisciplinary concept
of education. The interdisciplinary approach to education seeks to present
students with experiences that demonstrate the interconnectedness of disciplines.
This approach provides students with added depth and insight through exposure
to multiple disciplines within a single lesson or series of lessons, actively
promoting cross-curricular educational experiences for students. The primary
reason that this approach remains unrealized is due to the fact that many
teachers lack a knowledge that extends significantly beyond their field
of endeavor. Often an interdisciplinary style of lesson or activity is presented
as team-teaching where each individual instructor contributes from their
discipline, but truly lacks the opportunity to learn for themselves the
perspectives of the other contributing members of the team. The resulting
lesson effectively remains a series of discrete phenomena where the student
is expected to synthesize a result. However, just the opposite is true in
a real-life situation. In a real-life situation the object of the experience
is itself the synthesis. It becomes the goal of the interdisciplinary approach
to guide students to learn about the concepts and factors that led to the
creation of the object, which represents the synthesis of knowledge. It
is the process of active participation in one’s education that draws
knowledge from the experience and worthwhile understanding. A student who
encounters a tree does so as an active experience rich in tactile and sensory
value. The tree itself is an active agent of biology, and subject to the
influences of its immediate surroundings. Classroom instruction in the Hydrologic
Cycle, and the economic, socio-political, and conservation concerns of our
national forests, do not convey nor translate into understanding how this
single tree functions as an active agent in its environs if you do not have
the experience of the tree to relate these concepts to. Students must therefore
encounter, disassemble, and reconstruct within their minds the knowledge
found in any situation, and in doing so find and make the experience relative
and relent.
|