The Pennsylvania State
University
C E 597 Bridge Engineering II
Spring Semester 2003
M W F 11:15A - 12:05P
304 Willard
Prerequisites: CE 549 (Bridge I) or equivalent | ||
Scope: | This course will present advanced topics in highway bridge analysis, design and evaluation. A basic understanding of the AASTHO code and bridge design is a prerequisite for the course. Advanced topics in steel and concrete bridge design, as well as bridge rehabilitation will be covered. | |
Texts: | AASHTO, LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Washington, D.C., 1998, 2nd Ed. | |
AASHTO, Guide Specifications for Horizontally Curved Steel Girder Highway Bridges with Design Examples for I-Girder and Box Girder Bridges (DRAFT), Washington, D.C. (material provided as handouts) | ||
AASHTO, Manual for the Condition Evaluation of Bridges, Washington, D.C., 2000, 2nd Ed. (material provided as handouts) | ||
AASHTO, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, Washington, D.C., 1993, 16th Ed. (material provided as handouts) | ||
AISI/NSBA, Highway Structures Design Handbook, 1995. (material provided as handouts) | ||
AISC, Manual of Steel Construction, Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD), 3rd Edition, 2001. | ||
W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Eds., Bridge Engineering Handbook, CRC Press, 2000 (optional). | ||
R.M. Barker and J.A. Puckett, Design of Highway Bridges, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1997. (optional) | ||
Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute, PCI Bridge Design Manual, Vol. 1 & 2, 1997. (material provided as handouts) | ||
P.P. Xanthakos, Bridge Strengthening and Rehabilitation, Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996. (optional) | ||
Instructors: |
Dan
Linzell (dlinzell@engr.psu.edu) |
Andrea
Schokker (ajs19@.psu.edu) |
Course webpage: http://www.engr.psu.edu/ce/courses/ce597E/ | ||
Office Hours: |
MW 2:30-4:30
p.m. (Linzell) |
|
Tentative Schedule: | ||
Part I - Concrete Bridge Topics | ||
|
0.5
hrs. |
|
Part II - Steel Bridge Topics | ||
|
0.5
hrs. |
|
Part III - Other Topics | ||
|
1 hrs. |
|
45 hrs. | ||
Grading: | ||
Design
Project Final Reports (2 @ 25%) Midterm Exam (Concrete topics, date & room TBA) Final (Steel topics, date & room TBA) |
50% |
|
Tentative Outline: | ||
Part I - Concrete Bridge Topics | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
XIV. Cable Stayed Bridge Intro |
||
XV. Substructure Design |
||
XVI. Considerations for Seismic Design |
||
Part II - Steel Bridge Topics | ||
I. Overview of Steel Bridges |
||
II. Box Girder Analysis and Design |
||
III. Skewed Analysis and Design |
||
IV. Curved Analysis and Design |
||
VI. Splice Design |
||
IX. Construction Issues |
||
Part III - Other Topics |
||
I. Aesthetics |
||
II. Bridge Management and Inspection |
||
III. Bridge Rehabilitation |
||
|
||
Academic Honesty: | ||
From
the Faculty Senate web site (http://www.psu.edu/ufs/policies/):
49-20 Academic Integrity Definition and expectations: Academic integrity is the pursuit of scholarly activity in an open, honest and responsible manner. Academic integrity is a basic guiding principle for all academic activity at The Pennsylvania State University, and all members of the University community are expected to act in accordance with this principle. Consistent with this expectation, the University's Code of Conduct states that all students should act with personal integrity, respect other students' dignity, rights and property, and help create and maintain an environment in which all can succeed through the fruits of their efforts. Academic integrity includes a commitment not to engage in or tolerate acts of falsification, misrepresentation or deception. Such acts of dishonesty violate the fundamental ethical principles of the University community and compromise the worth of work completed by others. To protect the rights and maintain the trust of honest students and support appropriate behavior, faculty and administrators should regularly communicate high standards of integrity and reinforce them by taking reasonable steps to anticipate and deter acts of dishonesty in all assignments (Senate Policy 44-40: Proctoring of Examinations). At the beginning of each course, it is the responsibility of the instructor to provide students with a statement clarifying the application of University and College academic integrity policies to that course. Design
Projects: You will be presenting to a panel that includes Drs. Linzell and Schokker, your classmates and representatives from industry. Details about the project and presentation requirements and grading will be handed out in class. Exams: |
||