REFLECTION
  
 

ABET Outcomes

for

AE 481W/482

Outcome not able to be assessed 

(Score of 0)

Level of ability demonstrated but below acceptable

(Score of 1)

Minimum acceptable level of ability demonstrated 

(Score of 2)

More than minimum level of ability demonstrated 

(Score of 3)

a. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering

      

X

b. An ability to analyze and interpret data

      
X

c. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs

    
X
 

e. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems

      
X

f. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility

      
X

g. An ability to communicate effectively

      
X

h. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context

    
X
  

i. An ability to engage in life-long learning

      
X

j. A knowledge of contemporary issues

      
X

k. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice

      
X

o. Engineering design capabilities in at least two (2) of the (3) basic curriculum areas of architectural engineering, and that design has been integrated across the breadth of the program

      
X

p. Communication and interaction with other design professionals in the execution of building projects

      
X

 

AE 481W/897:

I would be lying if I stated that the quality and necessity of this course to our development as Architectural Engineers was underestimated or undervalued in any way. The fall semester's reports held substantial background information needed to accurately disect each buildings systems to correctly interperet additional or replacement designs to improve construction, energy savings, cost, etc. in all ways feasible. Once this had been formulated, proper formulation of anaylses could occur. Some changes were held with high regard, where as others failed to make economic or engineering sense. Overall, this course was instrumental to the molding and developing of our knowledge base and field skills as Architectural Engineer elites.
CPEP and Discussion Board:
I would be lying if I stated that the discussion board helped me in any way. All questions that I had or research that I had to do was done by myself, talking to my advisors, or contacting professionals directly via telephone. My only post to the board was the necessary post required for course credit.
 
 

__________ ____
 
 
note: while great efforts have been taken to provide accurate and complete information on the pages of cpep, please be aware that the information contained herewith is considered a work-in-progress for this thesis project. modifications and changes related to the original building designs and construction methodologies for this senior thesis project are solely the interpretation of david miller. changes and discrepancies in no way imply that the original design contained errors or was flawed. differing assumptions, code references, requirements, and methodologies have been incorporated into this thesis project; therefore, investigation results may vary from the original design. this page was last updated on 4/28/09.