Header image

   

Structural

DENTE.A@GMAIL.COM

Centre Court Apartments, State College

 
line decor
  
line decor
         
 
 

User Note:

Note: While great efforts have been taken to provide accurate and complete information on the pages of CPEP, please be aware that the information contained herewith is considered a work-in-progress for this thesis project. Modifications and changes related to the original building designs and construction methodologies for this senior thesis project are solely the interpretation of Anthony P. Dente. Changes and discrepancies in no way imply that the original design contained errors or was flawed. Differing assumptions, code references, requirements, and methodologies have been incorporated into this thesis project; therefore, investigation results may vary from the original design.

 
 

 
 
  THESIS PROPOSAL  
 

This proposal outlines the alternative design of the Centre Court Apartments that will be conducted during the spring semester. The alternative design will consist of a main structural revision along with two breadth areas of study, one being construction management and the other sustainability overall. The main focus of the entire redesign is to reduce the environmental impacts caused by the materials and resources used to construct the Centre Court Apartments.

 

 

 
 
Structural Proposal:  
 
 
 

The main focus of this thesis is to address the environmental impact of the materials and systems currently being used in the Centre Court Apartments.  From a structural engineering standpoint, materials that are renewable, have low embodied energy, and/or are made with recycled content are the most preferred sustainable building elements.  Due to the 67.5’ height of the Centre Court Apartments, use of load bearing natural structural elements such as straw bale are prohibited by code and the bearing ability of the bales, therefore a non-load bearing straw bale wall assembly will be used.  Traditionally this post and beam system is done with timber framing.  Chapter 5 of the IBC 2006 height restrictions bans the use of timber frame, so a redesign of the CMU and hollow core slabs system will be done with a concrete frame lateral resisting system with two way flat plate slabs.  A high volume of fly ash or class C pozzolans, which is a waste product from coal burning power plants, will be incorporated into the concrete design mix, replacing up to 50% of the required Portland cement.  Not only does this create a safe, alternative use of contaminates from the power industry, but Portland cement is the most toxic and energy intensive ingredient in concrete due to the need of being heated to 2700 °F.

 

 
   
 
 

The straw bale walls will be built on end with a width of 12”. In this orientation, the bales have better thermal qualities and their structural value is not compromised because the entire load of the building is being carried by the concrete system. Because concrete
columns will be used in place of timbers this creates relative stiffness issues with caring a uniform stucco covering to protect the bales from moisture damage. Therefore the slab will extend past the frame and bear the panels completely out of the plane of the columns.

Straw bale construction on a story level of 67.5’ is not a very convenient task due to the unique nature of constructing a straw bale wall. The walls will be pre-cast either on site or offsite locally, and shipped in using methods similar to those of pre-casting straw bale companies around the globe. It also goes without saying that a wall assembly such as this is not a common practice by most local contractors or estimators, therefore, a simple cost breakdown and comparison of only the structural and enclosure system will be conducted against the original. A Microsoft Project schedule will be drafted to outline the feasibility of constructing such a system.

 

 
 
Architectural Breadth:
 
 
 
 

These straw bale wall assemblies will take the place of all CMU enclosure walls in the building, which will cause a need for alterations to the architectural layout. Due to the stucco finish that already exists on the exterior of the building, no large aesthetical
changes will need to be conducted.

The addition of a column grid to replace the load bearing CMU system will also create numerous architectural changes in particular in the parking garage and dealing with parking capacities in the local zoning code. Parking will also be affected by the building being extended to accommodate for the increased wall width of the straw panels.

A LEED evaluation of the redesigned building will be conducted if time permits.

 

 

 

 
 
  Revised Proposal 1/18/08 (pdf)  
  Re-revised Proposal 3/19/08 (pdf)  
   
 

 

 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

 

 

   
           
Senior Thesis | The Pennsylvania State University | Architectural Engineering | AE Lab | Contact Anthony P. Dente |
This Page was last updated on May 4, 2007May 4, 2007nt ©2005