Structural Option
 
1100 Broadway
Oakland, CA
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Proposal

 

Senior Thesis Proposal:
A depth study will be performed that focuses on the structural system of 1100 Broadway. The current composite floor system is 30.25” in depth and supporting composite member sizes are controlled by deflections. I propose to study the impact of a one-way mild steel reinforced concrete slab with post-tensioned concrete beams in place of the current composite metal deck and supporting composite steel beam gravity system that is currently in place. Advantages of the proposed system include better economy, reduced floor depth, and reduced deflections. The change of system will in turn require a change of lateral systems. Concrete shear walls will be chosen and designed for the new lateral system.

 

The proposed system will be designed using a combination of computer modeling programs and hand calculations to supplement and check the models.

Click Here for a PDF of the Original Proposal

Click Here for a PDF of the Revised Proposal

Click Here for a PDF of the Executive Summary

 

BREADTH TOPICS:
In addition to an in depth study of 1100 Broadway’s structural system, two additional studies will be conducted in fields of study outside of structures. These include an architectural breadth and a building envelope breadth that focus on the green roof on the historic Key System portion of 1100 Broadway.

 

Click Here for a PDF of the breadth topics

 

MAE TOPICS:
RAM modeling programs will be used to design and analyze the proposed concrete sytem. This is an extension of AE 597A (Computer Modeling) and is intended to meet the MAE requirement. Concepts from AE 542 (Building Enclosures) will be integrated into the breadth studies and will also fill the MAE requirement.
 
 
 
 
 
             
   
Note: While great efforts have been taken to provide accurate and complete information on the pages of CPEP, please be aware that the information contained herewith is considered a work‐in‐progress for this thesis project. Modifications and changes related to the original building designs and construction methodologies for this senior thesis project are solely the interpretation of Sonja Hinish. Changes and discrepancies in no way imply that the original design contained errors or was flawed. Differing assumptions, code references, requirements, and methodologies have been incorporated into this thesis project; therefore, investigation results may vary from the original design.  
This page was last updated on 1/19/09 by Sonja G. Hinish and is hosted by the AE Department ©2008
 
Penn State University
e-Studio
Architectural Engineering
AE Computer Web site