User Note: While great efforts have been taken to provide accurate and complete information on the pages of CPEP, please be aware that the information contained herewith is considered a work-in-progress for this thesis project. Modifications and changes related to the original building designs and construction methodologies for this senior thesis project are solely the interpretation of Erin Miller. Changes and discrepancies in no way imply that the original design contained errors or was flawed. Differing assumptions, code references, requirements, and methodologies have been incorporated into this thesis project; therefore, investigation results may vary from the original design.

 

REFLECTION

AE 481 & 897G REFLECTION

The AE Senior Capstone Thesis was a very rewarding experience.  Through research and discussion I was able to learn and develop ideas to apply to my thesis project.  The two semester model provided me with a structure in which to develop these ideas and to expand my knowledge of different disciplines.  The interdisciplinary nature of the course sequence was very rewarding and I further enhanced my ability to communicate and understand material across the disciplines. Overall, working through the problems and challenges helped me further understand the requirements and responsibilities of becoming an engineer.

CPEP REFLECTION

Using the CPEP website was a great way to organize and present material completed throughout the capstone process.  Its dynamic nature allowed for changes throughout the process and allowed myself to track how my project was changing.  It also allowed for potential employers and professors to review my work and offer advice.  Overall, I enjoyed using the CPEP website and it is a great time capsule for my 5th year capstone experience.

 

ABET OUTCOME SURVEY

Important Note: These outcomes relect a personal (student) assessment of the course, not the instructor's assessment.

ABET Outcomes
for AE 481W/482

Outcome not able to be assessed

Level of ability demonstrated but below acceptable

Minimum acceptable level of ability demonstrated

More than minimum level of ability demonstrated

(Score of 0)

 (Score of 1)

(Score of 2)

(Score of 3)

a. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering

b. An ability to analyze and interpret data

c. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs

e. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems

f. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility

g. An ability to communicate effectively

h. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context

i. An ability to engage in life-long learning

j. A knowledge of contemporary issues

k. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice

o. Engineering design capabilities in at least two (2) of the (3) basic curriculum areas of architectural engineering, and that design has been integrated across the breadth of the program

p. Communication and interaction with other design professionals in the execution of building projects

PROGRESS
04.27.2014 |
CPEP Site Complete
04.27.2014 |
04.27.2014 |
04.21.2014 |
04.09.2014 |
04.02.2014 |
Outline Posted
01.30.2014 |
Proposal Updated
01.15.2014 |
Proposal Page Updated
12.13.2013 |
Proposal Page Updated
12.13.2013 |
Proposal Posted
12.09.2013 |
Research Page Updated
11.19.2013 |
Research Page Updated
11.10.2013 |
TECH 3 Posted
10.14.2013 |
Abstract Updated
10.08.2013 |
10.04.2013 |
TECH 2 Posted
09.19.2013 |
Abstract Paper Draft
09.19.2013 |
TECH 1 Posted
09.02.2013 |
09.02.2013 |
09.02.2013 |
CPEP Site Launched
08.30.2013 |
Thank You Letters Sent
08.08.2013 |
Drawings & Specs Recieved
07.31.2013 |
Owner Permission Recieved
PENN STATE| AE |AE COMPUTER LABS | CONTACT: erin.c.miller@psu.edu
MODIFIED: 04.27.2014 BY ECM | HOSTED BY PSU ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT © 2014