800 NORTH GLEBE
ARLINGTON, VA

RYAN JOHNSON / ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING / STRUCTURAL OPTION

HOME STUDENT BIO BUILDING
STATISTICS
THESIS
ABSTRACT
TECHNICAL ASSIGNMENTS THESIS
RESEARCH
THESIS PROPOSAL PRESENTATION FINAL REPORT REFLECTION E-STUDIO


Technical Report 1: Existing Structural Conditions

Technical Report 1 examined the structural concepts and existing conditions of 800 North Glebe in an effort to more fully understand the design decisions of the engineer. Included in this report are detailed descriptions of the substructure, superstructure and lateral systems. Wind and seismic calculations, along with spot checks of gravity loads, were computed to determine the adequacy of components and their impact on one another and the architecture.

To review a PDF format of this report, click here or the image above.

 

Technical Report 2: Alternate Slab Analysis

Technical Report 2 examined the existing structural slab system and compared it to three alternative slab systems:

  • Two-way post-tensioned slab (new column layout)
  • Two-way post-tensioned slab (existing column layout)
  • Hollow Core precast concrete planks on steam beams (new column layout)

To review a PDF format of this report, click here or the image above.

 

Technical Report 3: Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design Reoprt

Technical Report 3 examined the existing structural Lateral system. Included in this are torsion, shear, displacement, story drift, and overturning checks.

To review a PDF format of this report, click here or the image above.

 

  Senior Theis Main Page The Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering Department AE Computer Labs Contact Ryan Johnson: rgj5003@psu.edu  

Special thanks to The JBG Companies for use of renderings from 800northglebe.com

User Note: While great efforts have been taken to provide accurate and complete information on the pages of CPEP, please be aware that the information contained herewith is considered a work-in-progress for this thesis project. Modifications and changes related to the original building designs and construction methodologies for this senior thesis project are solely the intrepretation of Ryan Johnson. Changes and discrepencies in no way imply that the original designed contained errors or was flawed. Differing assumptions, code references, requirements, and methodologies have been incorporated into this thesis project; therefore, investigation results may vary from the original design.

This was last updated on December 1, 2009 by Ryan Johnson and is hosted by the AE Department © 2009